George Xenakis
+246325Laatste reacties
Popular on GPBlog
1
F1 LIVE | Follow FP2 for the Japanese Grand Prix here
1767 times read
2
F1 Full Results | Japanese Grand Prix FP2: Piastri P1, Norris P2
1706 times read
3
Mercedes breaks F1 rule ahead of Japanese Grand Prix weekend
1059 times read
4
Tsunoda proves Red Bull right: A tenth off Verstappen as Norris leads
953 times read
+0
George Xenakis
In summation, 10 races for Nyck (as we say in statistics) do not provide enough data.13-07-2023 12:55
+0
George Xenakis
Ludizapoli, equality belongs to opportunities and the likes not to capabilities.Riccardo's early results (poor results of Daniel cited in my first post) make evident NOT the sentimentality as a basis for his seat in F1. Reason & rationality acted upon his team and Daniel became a better driver with 8 wins and so on. Indeed ,most of the time teams have all the data we don't,nevertheless teams have an inclination (periodically) to make decisions regardless of the data.13-07-2023 12:34
+0
George Xenakis
I understand your argument, while Mr. Marko's choices aren't flawless.If they were (flawless) ,he wouldn't hire De Vries at all.13-07-2023 17:58
+0
George Xenakis
HI Ludizapoli, if it didn't matter at all we probably wouldn't ask if it matters or not.13-07-2023 09:29
+0
George Xenakis
Mr. Marko appears intelligent & witty (save normal age obstacles). Albeit lately he has shown signs of being confused ,hasty & impulsive. Regardless of the year (conditions are distinct) Ricciardo headed off in 2011 ( arrival in F1) with (in the first 11 races)the positions = 19th,19th,18th,,Ret,NC,19th,22nd,19th,18th,Ret,20th Points = 0.12-07-2023 20:17
+0
George Xenakis
Dynamiq , the reasoning of my proposition arrives from the actuality of antagonism (competition).Competition decides what the value of a game is. One of the "dictums" of antagonism is the presence of lots of very strong teams not just one very strong team.11-04-2023 19:16
+0
George Xenakis
Assuming competition has nothing to do with fairness, we grant the lack of competition as more fair, ergo "running a Marathon" with one runner (by oneself) is more fair. At the minute Red Bull is running by oneself for the Championship as McLaren did in 1988 and Mercedes in 2016.Thus,"we" can never let Floyd Mayweather Jr. to box opposing a 13 year old teenager.12-04-2023 06:02
+0
George Xenakis
Dynamiq, the Floyd Mayweather reference was a metaphor.No athlete fancies to battle with a far inferior opponent. Leclerc ,Alonso & F.Tost among others thoroughly understand that Red Bull is in "another" category. https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/alonso-not-in-a-position-to-beat-perez-red-bull-in-saudi-arabian-f1-gp/10445561/ https://www.crash.net/f1/news/1022386/1/red-bull-are-another-planet-leclerc-s-honest-admission-after-qualifying https://www.planetsport.com/motorsport/news/alphatauri-boss-franz-tost-admits-way-behind-expected12-04-2023 17:54
+0
George Xenakis
Hi Dynamiq, as I explain "less'' fair is still fair but "less",not unfair.11-04-2023 14:43
+0
George Xenakis
1988 An awful Year , McLaren won 15 races out of 16,in so doing was McLaren at "fault" ? No. 2016 An awful Year , Mercedes won 19 races out of 21,in so doing was Mercedes at "fault"? No. 2023 Red Bull is highly endowed to win 23 races out of 23, ,in so doing Red Bull happens to be at "fault"? No. The accountability pertains to the F1 management and the FIA. A team isn't in the wrong when successful. Less competition equals less fair play.Winning nonstop isn't boring,(in the main) it is less fair. Is F1 & the FIA equal to the task of producing more competition? Yes ,if not I do "not see" how is this any good."At the minute we observe 10 stores (teams) & the public is "shopping" solely from 1 store(team)" .Very well done job by Red Bull in 2023,be that as it may, it's going to be an awful year .11-04-2023 13:10